Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the above fine is not paid, the defendant shall be the defendant for 30 days.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, on May 12, 2016, committed assault against the Victim C on May 12, 2016, within Eart located in Gangseo-si, 00:20 on May 12, 2016, when he/she was talked with the Victim C (33) who is a customer, he/she was the victim’s age.

For the reason that the victim said that he was “,” assaulted twice by drinking the victim’s face face.

2. On June 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) opened the entrance door of “H” at the victim F (56) located in Gangseo-si G around 22:20 on June 10, 2016; and (b) opened at the entrance of the said main office, and the victim did not receive the Defendant’s seat as the Defendant’s customer; (c) on the ground that the Defendant did not receive the Defendant’s seat, the Defendant sent the passbook, head of Tong, and head of the Tong.

”라고 큰 소리로 말하고, 다른 손님의 제지로 위 주점 밖으로 나와서도 주점 출입문 바로 앞 노상에 서서, 피해자를 향하여 짚고 있던 목발로 삿대질을 하듯이 피해자를 가리키며 피해자에게 “ 신고 해, 씹할, 뭘 쳐다봐, 날 잡았어,

H, why is, and is not wh, h fat, fat with those of this kind;

reported

was known;

Accordingly, it was difficult to avoid a disturbance for about 10 minutes, such as making a significant sound or bath to H of those who can drink, following the report.”

The Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business by force as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each investigation report (the confirmation of the details of witness, attachment of a photo at H's main place, attachment of a photograph of a crime, attachment of a photograph of a video, and reporting on the confirmation of video related to the obstruction of duties) shall be

1. The point of violence against the relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the judgment of the choice of punishment: The point of interference with the affairs set forth in Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of penalty)

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the maximum amount of two crimes as indicated in the holding) of the aggravated concurrent crimes is heavier than punishment.