A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2015, around 01:20, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim E, F, who is the main owner of the above main unit, with the influence of approximately 10 minutes by force of the victims, such as “D”, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f. at the 10-minute underground of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., e., f., f., f., f., f., f.

2. On October 29, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the street, around the immediately preceding the instant main station; (b) the police officers, etc. belonging to the Seoul Song-gu Police Station G District, Song-gu, Seoul, who was called upon 112 reports on the above crime, attempted to put the Defendant into his hands his/her hands when intending to “per bit bit son, see, see, see, e.g., this bit son; and (c) assaulting the police officers at once, thereby obstructing the police officers from performing their duties relating to the prevention and investigation of crimes, public peace and order, and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of each part of the defendant in the protocol of public trial on the first and second occasions;

1. Each legal statement of witness I and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and E;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following factors shall be considered in favor of the defendant among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include: (a) there is no record of having committed the same kind of crime with the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act; (b) the confession of a crime interfering with duties; (c) the health status is not good; and (d) the fact that a person appears

On the other hand, this is.