logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2017.06.09 2017고정35
공갈
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in activities as a reporter of a third class or a South-North family belonging to C.

As the Defendant knew that aggregate screening and processing companies operating in the vicinity of Sejong City are commercial wastes generated in the course of their work and illegally buried in farmland, etc. without entrusting the disposal business entity with the disposal business entity, the Defendant used the aforementioned business entity’s illegal act to report the illegal act through the media or to file a complaint with the administrative authority, and thus, intended to demand the said business entity to pay money under the pretext of the same.

On March 6, 2015, the Defendant shows the name of the reporter of the Victim E in Sejong-si (State, Gu, G) office operated by the victim E (State, Gu, G). The Defendant, who is an employee of the said F, shows the name of the reporter of C, to the head of the Victim H, who is an employee of the said F, and clarify the reporter’s identity and indicate “Sler treatment well.”

There are many problems in the military.

“In doing so, I would like to talk to the effect that I would like to agree with the above F, and the head of the said H would have the same content delivered to the J (State) operated by the victim I, a same kind of company in the vicinity of the F, and if I did not pay money, I would like to report to the media or file a complaint with the administrative office.

The Defendant, by the foregoing method, received a total of KRW 1,60,000 from the victims to June 30, 2015, a total of four times, as shown in the daily list of crimes, from the victims, to the victims of drinking frightage.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made to the second prosecutor's office with regard I;

1. Each police statement made with respect to I, E, and H;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of a reporters' name cards;

1. Relevant Article 350 of the Criminal Act and Article 350 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow