logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.12.10 2020고단5293
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one shall distribute or provide game products, the contents of which are different from the contents of the rating classification obtained by the Game Products Management Committee, and shall exchange or arrange for exchange or exchange or repurchase the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game products for business purposes.

Nevertheless, Defendant A established and operated a “V” game room with the permission of a general game providing business operator in Gwangju Mine-gu C and 3, and established and operated a “D” game room. Defendant B, who was employed by the employees of the above game room, managed the game room and reported the major situation to the above A according to the order of the above A, and conspired to exchange in cash after deducting the fee when the customer acquired the points through the use of the game.

Defendants from April 14, 2020 to the same year

5. Until August 8, 200, in addition to the function of obtaining a Spanish social card according to the display of specific background images, such as 40 games, snick, snick, snicking, etc. in the above game site, in addition to the function of obtaining a Spain social card in the above game site, many unspecified customers have provided game products different from the original classification, and, if customers wish to exchange points points obtained through the use of the game, they exchanged the difference between the points less than 10%

As a result, the defendants conspired to provide game products with contents different from the contents classified by the Game Management Committee, and exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A report on internal investigation (field status and the details of detection), report on internal investigation (related to the alteration and alteration of game products), report on internal investigation (related to the classification of game products), report on internal investigation (permission and registration ledger);

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on daily settlement;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal doctrine on criminal facts.

arrow