logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.12.22 2014가합13144
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From 2012 to 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a quality inspection contract with the Defendant with respect to the supply of goods to the Defendant. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff entered into a quality inspection contract with the Defendant that entered into a quality inspection contract with the Defendant to deliver the goods manufactured at once to the Gangnam branch of the FITI test institute (FITT & Resing) as an incorporated foundation. On January 4, 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff requested for the test and analysis of the goods. The Plaintiff entered into a quality inspection contract with the Defendant on the date of concluding the contract. The Plaintiff is a female diverser (X1JW-WDW94, hereinafter “instant 94 diverser”).

() On July 19, 2013, USD 325,000,00 on July 19, 2013, 2013, the Dazers for Women (X1JW-WD93, hereinafter “instant 93Dazers”).

() 10,000 U.S. dollars 350,000 on July 19, 2013 and 25, 2013 for female use (X2KS-PW96, hereinafter “the instant land”).

) On January 18, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the supply of goods with the Defendant in 2013 (hereinafter “instant contract for the supply of goods”).

나. 피고의 물품 수령 거절 1) 피고는 위 물품 중 이 사건 94다운점퍼 1,200벌, 이 사건 93다운점퍼 10,000벌, 이 사건 바지 4,700벌의 수령을 거절하였다. 2) 원고는 피고의 동의를 얻어 라벨을 땐 후 이 사건 93다운점퍼 10,000벌을 제3자에게 판매하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Eul evidence No. 4, purport of whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The defendant's refusal to receive the goods produced by the plaintiff is attributable to the defendant's side as follows. Thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages equivalent to the amount obtained by deducting the profits earned by the plaintiff from the expenses paid by the plaintiff for the production of the clothing of this case from the expenses paid by the plaintiff to a third party.

1. Among the 94 Dan Corerus of this case, the 1,500 Gauri color is due to defects, thereby, FITI.

arrow