1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant B, including the claim extended and reduced in this court.

1. The reasons for this part of the underlying facts are as follows, with the exception that part of the corresponding part of the grounds of the judgment of the first instance (as stated below, the corresponding part of the grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance (as stated in paragraph (1) and 3, 11 to 6, 12) is written. Accordingly, this part of the reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

5 Myeon 1 5 - Attached 2 - Attached 1 - 3 - [Attachment 2] - [Attachment 1 - [Attachment 2] - 1 - - 3 - - - - 1 - - 5 - - 1 - - - 3 - - - - - - - - - - 154, 141, 947 147, 527, 401 - 453,054, 684 - 80, 394, 395, 364 - 831, 191, 398, 6251, 639, 107, 105 - - - 5 - - - - 5 - - - - 3 - - 5 - - - - 5 - - - - - 3 - - 1 - 1 3 - 5 - - -4 -

The part up to “AD and AE Dong K are as follows: Provided, That in the case of the first credit assignment household, the Plaintiff does not include each of the above households in the credit assignment household, and in the first instance court, the Plaintiff’s damage claim against Nonparty C was excluded from the creditor subrogation claim against Defendant B. However, this court included each of the above households in the above households in the credit assignment household, and the damage claim was added to the above secured claim (see Plaintiff’s preparatory document dated April 5, 2018). 6, 1, “1565.3 households” in the first half of 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1, “(1,567.3 households”; and 5th 5th 12th 5th 12th 3th 2018 as follows.

“3) The entire apartment site area of this case is 184,767.1751m2, and the entire apartment site area of this case is 184,767m2.