1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of appeal and the claims in this court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification and addition as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

(The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff in the trial at the time of appeal are different from the contents alleged by the first instance court. However, in light of the Plaintiff’s above allegations, it is not different from the fact-finding and judgment at the first instance court. 2. Amendment and addition to the part of the first instance judgment “16,” which is “17,” is added to “16,” which is “13,” respectively.

Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be amended from Part 5 to Part 5 of Part 5 to Part 6.

According to the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, the plaintiff's debt amount at the time of the conciliation of this case was 89,11,038 won, 340,000 won, 291,620,253 won, 422,000 won, 102,891,431 won, 134, 222,784 won, 108, 298, 506 won, 108, 108, 201, 300 won, 208, 201, 300 won, 40, 208, 201, 204, 208, 201, 300 won, 10, 108, 108, 300, 204, 201, 204, 204, 201, 300.