1. At the same time, the Defendant receives KRW 55,00,000 from the Plaintiff, and CD students and addresses: Yangcheon-gu Seoul E and Cdong.

Basic Facts

The indication of the parties to an intermediate payment of KRW 30 million on August 20, 2015: The intermediate payment of KRW 10 million on August 10, 2015: The indication of the parties to an intermediate payment of KRW 30 million on August 20, 2015: the transferor is referred to as “A” and the transferee as “B” and the contract is concluded by mutual agreement as follows.

Article 1 (License for Transport Business and Affiliated Motor Vehicles) In principle, A and B should have a transfer qualification or acquisition qualification as prescribed by the law.

Article 6 (A) No person shall claim the return of the down payment where he/she has placed the down payment at the time of a violation, and the down payment where B has placed the down payment

Article 7 In case of entering into a transfer or acquisition contract with a broker, a qualified transferor, a right to select other legal rights related to Gap and Eul shall be consented by the broker to act as agent for the broker.

Consenter: He shall hear all the terms of the contract of the defendant and affix his signature and seal to him.

The name: On August 10, 2015, the Defendant entered into a contract for acquisition and transfer of personal taxi (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the following terms: (a) to transfer the personal taxi transport business license under the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant license”) and its affiliated motor vehicles to KRW 95 million in total; and (b) to transfer the private taxi transport business license under the name of the Defendant (hereinafter “instant license”).

On the other hand, the above contract was signed by rubbers containing the trade name of F, the Plaintiff’s name, and the phrase “personal taxi transfer and takeover”.

On August 10, 2015, the Plaintiff paid the down payment of KRW 10 million on August 10, 2015, and on August 14, 2015, a dispute arises between the original Defendant in relation to the black cream, which was installed on the Defendant’s vehicle, and on August 14, 2015, the Defendant sent to the Plaintiff on August 19, 2015 the word “the request for the return of the motor vehicle to its original state” to the Plaintiff.

On August 17, 2015, the Plaintiff sold an end payment of KRW 30 million to a third party under the name of the Defendant. On August 20, 2015, the Plaintiff paid an intermediate payment of KRW 30 million to the Defendant.