logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.02 2016가합534861
저작권침해로 인한 손해배상청구 등
Text

1. Co-ownership of Defendant D, C, and MFCA:

A. The plaintiff Gap 3,00,000 won and the plaintiff Eul 2,000.

Reasons

1. As to the plaintiffs' claims related to Defendant Culture Broadcasting, MFCA, C, and D'H

A. Basic facts 1) The Korea Music Copyright Association (hereinafter “Plaintiff Association”) as the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff’s status as the parties.

() Pursuant to Article 105 of the Copyright Act and Article 32 of the Civil Act, a nonprofit incorporated association that allows users who need musical works to use a musical work with the permission of the copyright trust management business from the Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism on behalf of a copyright holder and collects user fees from users to distribute the musical work to the relevant copyright holder. Defendant Culture Broadcasting is the drama of “H” (hereinafter “instant title 1 drama”).

(1) From July 2006 to December 2006, Defendant MFCA, as its subsidiary company of Defendant Culture Broadcasting, operates the business of distributing dramas and other works produced in Defendant Culture Broadcasting from abroad, and Defendant C is an employee belonging to Defendant MFCA. The Plaintiff and B are writers, and Plaintiff A and the trustee acquired the copyright from the truster and the truster of the copyright trust agreement between the Plaintiff and Plaintiff A and the Association under Article 3(a) of the Copyright Trust Agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff (the truster of the copyright trust agreement) during the term of the contract, and the trustee acquired the copyright from the truster and the truster of the copyright trust agreement between the truster and the truster of the copyright trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff (the truster of the copyright trust agreement).

Article 4 (Exclusion from Scope of Entrusted Management) (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 3 and 5, the truster may exclude the following user behavior from the scope of entrusted management:

arrow