logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.10.22 2014나2028631
손해배상(지)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the judgment of the first instance except for the addition or dismissal of the following parts in each corresponding part. Thus, it shall accept it pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

“2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is not more than 4 pages “.. copyright infringement” and “D.. Claim for damages” as follows:

C. Defendant F, based on the Plaintiff’s theory of this case, broadcasted the drama of this case produced on the basis of a script substantially similar to the novel of this case. Defendant B, C, D, and E participated in the production of a script of this case. The Defendants infringed upon the Plaintiff’s copyright, such as the right to create a derivative work, etc. The Defendants were obligated to verify whether the scenarios were purchased or purchased a cinematographic work was made by infringing upon the third party’s original copyright. The novel of this case was widely disseminated as the first object, and it was produced by domestic writers. In light of the media’s reputation, etc., the Defendants still did not know that the Plaintiff’s copyright was infringed upon the Plaintiff’s right to use the novel of this case, even if they did not know that it was actually infringed upon the Plaintiff’s right to use the novel of this case.

arrow