beta
Text
As to the crime No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, the crime No. 2-A, (b), (c) and (3) of the judgment of the court shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On August 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, attempted fraud, and embezzlement at the Busan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 19, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence on November 20, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
"2014 Gohap118"
1. On June 27, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act and the Attorney-at-Law Act came to know D, which was detained due to the crime of Bosing during the detention at the Busan detention center, as seen above, and upon receiving a request from D that D, “When having known his or her legal profession well, he or she may release him by requesting the Ministry of Justice to the employee of the Ministry of Justice through his or her legal profession, who has been using the money,” and that D, “at the time of discharge, he or she has been aware of his or her internal bond, and there was a large amount of money for Bosing.”
After the completion of the sentence on November 20, 2012, on November 20, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement in a coffee shop stating that “A victim C, who is the wife of the State of Busan, cannot be seen as having been well grounded in the legal profession in Seoul,” or that “A victim, who has been detained, has been released on several occasions, shall be released by the Defendant at the request of the Ministry of Justice to the staff of the Ministry of Justice through his/her own money, so that the husband may be released by his/her husband due to Crisma special history. If the legal professional personnel is confined, the expenses need first to be borne.”
However, since the defendant did not know about the legal professional person, he did not request the employees of the Ministry of Justice to release the husband of the victim's husband to the Churma special history, and did not have any intention or ability to release the victim's husband to the Churma special history.
The Defendant, as above, deceiving the victim and deceiving him from the victim, is the defendant under the pretext of teaching the legal profession person from November 30, 2012.