1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination on the legitimacy of the instant disposition

A. In the instant case where the Defendant asserts that the instant disposition released from the attached Form - was taken on the basis of the relevant laws and regulations, the Plaintiff asserts that “if the Plaintiff’s employee was indicted for violating the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts and Subordinate Statutes (i.e., sexual traffic brokerage, etc.) as an employee of the Plaintiff, the instant disposition is unlawful and should be revoked.”

나. 그러나 B이 이미 ‘성매매 알선 등 행위의 처벌에 관한 법률 위반죄(성매매 알선 등)’로 벌금형의 유죄판결을 받았고, 그 유죄판결(☞ 이 법원 2019노382 판결)이 2019. 7. 초순경 그대로 확정된 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없으므로, 원고 측이 저지른 이러한 범죄행위를 처분사유로 삼은 이 사건 처분은 적법하고, 이 점을 다투는 원고의 주장은 받아들일 수 없다.

2. Accordingly, we cannot accept the Plaintiff’s claim of this case.