A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of ‘D' in Suwon-si C' in Suwon-si C.

On June 26, 2017, the defendant, around 20:40 on June 26, 2017, sent 100,000 won to the police officer in charge of the crackdown on the visit of customers in the above place of business, as the price for sexual traffic, brought the control police officer into the room, brought the control police officer into the room, and arranged sexual traffic by bringing the female employee who possessed the red sea

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Each report on internal investigation (the current status of field crackdown, and attaching the field pictures of the case);

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following factors shall be considered in favor of the defendant among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations] / The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the same Act / [the scope of punishment / the brokerage of commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older, etc., and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (any person who is subject to special sentencing) and the scope of comparison of recommended sentences / The scope of sentence: the act of engaging in the brokerage of commercial sex acts for six months to one year (the decision of sentence] is a serious social harm, such as impairing sound sexual culture, etc.

Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence twice for the same or similar crimes, including the violation of the Act on the Prevention of Prostitution, etc., the violation of the Regulation of Customs Business Act, the violation of the Punishment of Acts, the brokerage of sexual traffic, etc., and the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, including brokerage of sexual traffic, and the crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, including brokerage of sexual traffic, etc. on June 23, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months, even though he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment.

However, the defendant's acknowledgement of crime and the mistake are seriously reflected.