logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.03 2016나2000736
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is 1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (the trade name before the change is “F,” which was changed to the current trade name on November 1, 2012.

hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Company”).

(2) The Co-Defendant C (hereinafter “C”) of the first instance trial is a company conducting real estate education and publication, and e-learning service business. (2) The Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial (hereinafter “Defendant C”) served as the representative director or internal director of the Defendant company from October 14, 2009 to May 29, 2014. The Defendant D served as the representative director of the Defendant company from August 26, 2010 to December 18, 2014, and Defendant E is in office as the representative director of the Defendant company from April 1, 2014 to December 18, 2014. The Defendant E is in office as the inside director of the Defendant company from November 1, 2012 to April 1, 2014 to the date on which the representative director of the Defendant company is in office as the representative director of the Defendant company.

3 The plaintiff has been registered as an auditor of the defendant company from March 30, 2010 to March 30.

(b) Conclusion of contracts on investment in capital increase or re-business start-up;

arrow