A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 19:08 on February 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the victim’s live together with the Defendant “E” restaurant located in D, “E”; (b) made the victim and F, while drinking together with three employees, such as F, a daily worker working together with the Defendant, and returned F and F, and (c) continued to have a dispute with F and F, on the ground that the victim had continued to do so, regardless of his/her restraint, the Defendant: (a) stated the victim as the victim’s voice with the largest sound, “the dead, such as knife,” and (b) moved the victim from the next extended box below the above restaurant to the above valve, and (c) made the victim separate the valve part of the liquid petroleum gas tank connected to the above valve from the above valve to the gas tank, thereby moving the Plaintiff into the road, and (d) moved the said gas tank to the outside of the road, and (d) made the victim’s marnish and the above gas tank connected to the valve.”

Accordingly, the Defendant released gas and caused danger to human life, body or property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Report on internal investigation (verifications of patrol vehicles and video images of patrol vehicles) and video images of patrol boxes;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 172-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant is disadvantageous even after the gas was newly discovered in liquid petroleum gas pipelines, that the victim of escape is again towed to a restaurant.

However, the Defendant confessions the instant crime and repents the mistake in depth, the victims and the owners of “G” restaurant do not want the punishment of the Defendant, and the gas breaks out.