1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The defendant shall have Category C (C and the last address: Doz.) with the area of 1,114 square meters prior to Sejong Special Self-Governing City.

1. Basic facts

A. Unregistered land of this case, E-Myeon (designated on January 1, 1995, E-Myeon) in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and combined with other Myeons on July 1, 2012, was changed to “FMyeon of Sejong Special Self-Governing City” respectively.

B) 1,14 square meters prior to B (hereinafter “instant land”).

(1) Article 15 of the Decree on the Investigation of Land of Shipbuilding, which is an unregistered land and its land cadastre, provides that Article 15 of the Decree on May 7, 1919, shall be determined by the assessment of the owner as the owner, and Article 15 of the Decree on the Investigation of Land of Shipbuilding, which is the Japanese colonial Rule, shall be determined by the determination or adjudication of the circumstances. The Supreme Court held that a person, who received the land assessment, has acquired the ownership of the land in a timely fashion (see Supreme Court Decision 83Do2118, Oct. 25, 1983).” (See subparagraphs 1 and 2 of the evidence 1) The above land cadastre states that “The address of the above C is indicated only as “D” and no other personal information is written.

B. On November 8, 2012, the Plaintiff, who ordered the Plaintiff to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration, filed a lawsuit against the Defendant and the said C to confirm that the instant land was owned by the said C, and the said C filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration on July 1, 1993 with respect to the said land.

The above lawsuit is initiated by public notice as to C, and on August 20, 2013, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant against the defendant on August 20, 2013 is dismissed on the ground that the defendant does not dispute not the land of this case but the ownership of the defendant, which is the State, for the reason that the plaintiff has no interest in seeking confirmation of ownership against the defendant, and the claim against the above C is dismissed as

The judgment was rendered (see Daejeon District Court 2012Da47996, and evidence No. 2-1). 2 The plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment No. 2012Gadan4796, Daejeon District Court 2012.

The above lawsuit is also service by public notice against C.