1. All claims filed by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiff (appointed party) and the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. According to the land survey division prepared pursuant to the former Land Survey Ordinance, the land survey division stated that C residing in Gangwon Kim Jong-gun B was determined on November 30, 191, which was about 2,93 and E answers 1,161, which was decided on November 30, 195 by Gangwon-gun Kim Jong-gun.

B. After that, the 2,93 mar, Gangwon Kim Jong-gun, as indicated in the attached Table following the change of administrative district and conversion of the front unit, was the F field 9,894mar, Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-do, and the E field 1,161mar was the F field 3,838mar (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant land”).

C. The instant land was entirely destroyed by the registry and cadastral record at the time of war on June 25, 2000.

The cadastral record was restored on August 1, 1990, but remains unregistered until now.

G (Death on April 18, 201) is the difference between G and I (Death on August 15, 200), a parent of C H, and the Selection J is the wife of G, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Selection, K, L, and M. G’s children.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 8, 9 (including each number), Eul evidence No. 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the land of this case was originally acquired by the plaintiff's fleet C under the circumstances of the plaintiff's fleet C, and the land of this case was inherited in succession to N, the son of C, and the Ha, the son of N and H, after the death of C, was inherited in succession to N, the son of N and H.

6. On March 6, 1990, after I sold the instant land to P on March 6, 1990, I again purchased the instant land from P on July 1, 1990, and the Plaintiff and the designated parties died and jointly inherited the instant land, the Defendant asserts that the instant land was owned by the Plaintiff and the designated parties according to the inheritance shares of the Plaintiff and the designated parties.

3. We examine the judgment. The plaintiff was investigated by C, which is the plaintiff's fleet.