logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.25 2015가단127014
소유권확인
Text

1. It is confirmed that the real estate recorded in the separate sheet between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Republic of Korea is owned by Defendant B.

Reasons

1. In the absence of counter-proof such as the change of the contents of the circumstances by the adjudication, the person registered as the owner in the Land Survey Division or the Forest Survey Division concerning the claim against the defendant Republic of Korea shall be presumed to be the owner of the land, and the circumstance shall be presumed to have become final and conclusive, and the person who received the land assessment shall acquire the land in a timely manner. As such, the circumstance title holder without any proof that the contents

Attached Form

According to the fact that the land indicated in the list (hereinafter referred to as the "land in this case") is unregistered, there is no dispute between the parties, and according to the evidence Nos. 3 and 1 evidence Nos. 1 (including a serial number, if any), D, which was located in the Gyeonggi-do Branch C on Oct. 17, 44 and 17, entered that the land in this case was assessed against the land in this case. The owner of the land in this case shall be deemed to be the defendant B, unless there is any other evidence to reverse it, such as the change of the content of the circumstance by a ruling.

Meanwhile, comprehensively taking account of the aforementioned evidence and the overall purport of the arguments as to the fact-finding on the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the head of Seoul FF Dong, the head of Goyang-si, and the head of Goyang-si, and the purport of the entire arguments, Defendant B’s resident registration number or specific lot number is not indicated in the land cadastre of this case, and otherwise, Defendant B’s personal information, its life, and location are not verified. Thus, the land in this case constitutes a case where the registration titleholder cannot be identified solely on the land survey register

As long as the defendant B, who is the registered titleholder, is not known, the completion of the prescription of possession.

arrow