logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.11.23 2017고단1125
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2008, the defendant of "2017 Highest 1125" means that the defendant intends to purchase a C mountain site in the Myeongyang, the injured party B, and the "Seoul mountain site in the Myeongyang," and the defendant contact the head of the mountain, the broker, etc.

When lending money, it is intended to return the money when purchasing the above money.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any particular property and did not have any intention or ability to purchase the above places or pay the money to the victim in a normal condition of bad credit.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 3 million won from the damaged party as the borrowed money from the damaged party, and acquired it by fraud.

In addition, from that to February 20, 2008, the Defendant received a total of KRW 8.4 million on four occasions as indicated in the list of crimes as set forth below from that to that of February 20, 2008, and acquired it by fraud.

Around September 8, 2009, the defendant of "2017 Highest 2005" knew that the victim F's car parked in the front of the office of the E company located in Gangseo-gu Busan, Busan, was found to be the land of agricultural company." The victim knew that he/she was found to be the land of agricultural company. The land of the fuel complex created in the Dobong-gu, where he/she had a director and director for viewing and the head of division is transferred.

In addition, 48,00 square meters will be leased for five years to lease the site in installments.

On the other hand, the false statement was made that the director general of the viewing bureau, the director of the division, and the person in charge should take personnel affairs, and that the 15 million won is changed.

However, the defendant did not have a dynamic who works as a viewing public official and thought that he would use the money received from the injured party for his personal purpose, such as repayment of debt, etc., so even if he received the money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to have the injured party receive the money from the injured party to lease

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, and deceiving the victim, shall be from September 9, 2009.

arrow