A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 13, 2014, the Defendant stated that “The victim C shall operate a water-resistant feed business and issue a monthly wage to employees, and the amount of the feed would not be collected, and the Defendant borrowed KRW 10 million only for three months.”

However, in fact, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party only for bank loans and credit card payment obligations, the Defendant was thought to use it as the existing repayment and cost of living, and there was no intention or ability to repay it in time.

On August 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred KRW 10 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (D) in the name of the Defendant on August 13, 2014.

2. On May 13, 2016, the Defendant needs to pay funds to the victim that “A child her birth has set off at once” to the victim.

The belief made a false statement that she would make repayment two months after lending money to she is responsible for she.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to a large amount of debt at the time, he was thought to use it in paying his personal debt, and he did not have any intention or ability to repay the borrowed money in time.

On May 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) transferred KRW 9 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of the Defendant on May 13, 2016; and (c) KRW 10 million in total to the same account on May 14, 2016.

3. On September 12, 2016, the Defendant stated to the victim that “If he/she had fluened a fly fly, he/she had fly fly worked, he/she would have fly repaid fly KRW 20 million on November 2016, 2016, he/she believed that money would need to be paid, and that he/she would have lent 10 million to his/her birth, he/she would have to fully repaid 20 million if he/she had fly lent fly worked in his/her name.”

However, it is true that the defendant borrowed money from the injured party due to a large amount of debt at the time.