logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.05.09 2013고정106
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a BX212 chartered bus.

On October 20, 2012, the Defendant, at around 18:30 on October 20, 2012, when the crossing of the decline distance in the Sindo Eup at the time of Ansan Do, came to proceed at a two-lane speed from the boundary of the central university to the air-section. Since the signal lights are installed, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving, had a duty of care to reduce the speed and drive safely in accordance with the new name after looking at the right and the left and right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the left by neglecting the signal as it is, and received the front portion of the front right side of the victim C(ma, 35 years old) driving with the normal signal.

Thus, the above victim suffered injury to the victim E (Nam and 6 years of age) who was accompanied by the fright base and tension of the fright base and the fright base of the fright base of the fright base, and the fright base of the fright base of the fright base of the fright base in need of stability for about two weeks, the fright base of the fright base of the fright base, the fright base of the fright base of the fright base, the fright base of the fright base of the fright base, the fright base of the fright base of the fright base of the fright base, and

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual survey report and the traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) requires consideration of the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle for the reason of sentencing was insured by the mutual aid association, that the Defendant was undergoing brain surgery after this case, and that the Defendant’s family relation is not good

arrow