logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.13 2013고합572
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인준강간등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From May to June, 2011, the Defendant was aware of the victim E (the age of 19) (the age of 19) who frequently found the said park while visiting the D Park around Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

The defendant, while talking with the victim, is divided into the victim, the intellectual ability is considerably lowered compared to normal persons, the victim does not resist against the suppression attitude and does not resist against others, the victim does not leave the park without family protection, and the victim is willing to engage in sexual intercourse by using the state of her ability to resist due to intellectual disorder.

1. On March 2013, the Defendant discovered the victims of Dpark located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, and discovered the victims of the park around the park, and the victims were able to see the victim as “a person who was on board the park,” and the victim was sexual intercourse with the victim by inserting the victim’s chest and fel, etc., on his hand, putting the victim on the bed, using the state of being unable to resist due to intellectual disorder, to the extent that it is impossible to know the second floor of F, located in the area near the said park, “Gel” located in F, which is located in the said park, and the victim’s sexual part.

2. On April 13, 2013, the Defendant discovered a victim who was travelling around the park in D Park, and found the victim in the same manner as in the preceding paragraph, and tried to have sexual intercourse with the victim by putting the victim on the bed, lying the victim on the bed, lying the victim’s chest and sound on his hand, and inserting the victim’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound, but the Defendant attempted to have sexual intercourse with the victim by inserting the victim’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound. However, the Defendant did not have attempted to have such intent on the wind that the police officer dispatched upon receipt of the report came.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each victim of the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant by the prosecution.

arrow