Text
The Defendant, as the Plaintiff
(a) Indication of the attached Form 1 drawings on the first floor of the building listed in the attached list;
(a).
(c).
(a) -.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A building listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant condominium building”) is an aggregate building of the 4th underground and the 8th underground floors. The 4th underground floors are mechanical rooms, the 3rd underground and the 2nd underground floors are parking lots, the 1st underground and the 1st, the 2nd and the 3rd underground floors are the commercial buildings called “B” (hereinafter “instant commercial buildings”); the 4th above ground floors are business facilities and neighborhood living facilities (financial institutions, council members, etc.); the 5th above ground floors are educational and research facilities (school facilities, etc.); the 6th above ground floors are business facilities and neighborhood living facilities (office facilities, etc.); the 7th above ground floors are sports facilities and the 8th sports facilities and neighborhood living facilities.
B. Meanwhile, on January 30, 2019, the Plaintiff is a superstore manager who has completed a report under Article 12(3) of the Distribution Industry Development Act with respect to the instant commercial building to the head of Gangdong-gu. The Defendant is a management body under the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings, which consists of sectional owners of the instant condominium buildings (hereinafter “the Aggregate Buildings Act”).
C. On the center part of each floor of the instant shopping mall, as seen in the Appendix 1 through 4, there are escalators (see the part indicated in the store line, e.g., the see the part indicated in the store line; hereinafter “the instant escalators”). On June 25, 2018, the head of Gangdong-gu issued an order to suspend operation until the time of passing the inspection on the grounds that the aforementioned escalators failed to pass the safety inspection under the Elevator Safety Control Act (hereinafter “elevator”).
The defendant around May 2019 without the plaintiff's consent, each of the drawings in attached Forms 1 through 4 with respect to the entrance part of each of the escalators in this case.
(a).
(c).
(a) To connect each point in sequence and each part in the ship;
(f) g. H.;
E. The steel structure (hereinafter “the steel structure”) installed in the steel structure of this case in a way that connects steel bars, steel bars, etc. to each point, and prevented the use of each of the said steel structure. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, and that there is no ground for recognition.