logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.06.16 2019가단227162
건물퇴거청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall display 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the attached Form No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the 1st floor of Yongsan-gu Seoul and D ground.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. After completing the registration of ownership transfer on October 8, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s status as a sectional owner of the instant condominium building owned the said title as of November 1, 2012, the Plaintiff is a company that operates real estate management business, etc., among the buildings listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant condominium building”).

B. F Co., Ltd. and the Defendant’s management services contract 1) The instant aggregate building is a sports facility of the 18th floor above the ground level from the 6th underground floor, a neighborhood living facility, a business facility, and an apartment building, and a commercial building from the 3rd underground to the 4th underground floor (hereinafter “instant commercial building

(F) The apartment is from the fifth to the eighteenth above ground, and the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “F”).

(2) On February 1, 2004, the Defendant entered into a management service contract with F on December 1, 2004, and entered into a management service contract with F on the instant commercial building and parking lot on December 30, 201, and again entered into a management service contract with F on December 30, 201.

3) Meanwhile, the Defendant’s office for disaster prevention listed in the Disposition No. 1 (hereinafter “instant office for disaster management”).

in possession. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, each entry in Gap evidence 1-4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the above facts, the plaintiff, who is the co-owner of the management office of this case, the co-ownership of the common use area of the building of this case, without any special circumstance, can seek the eviction of the management office of this case against the defendant, who is the possessor of the management office of this case, as an act of preserving the jointly-owned property.

B. As to this, the Defendant shall transfer the possession to the Defendant by the managing body of the instant aggregate building.

arrow