logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.11.06 2020고단5571
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 16, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong site.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person driving B high-class automobiles

On July 31, 2020, at around 22:05, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.208% of blood alcohol concentration, and led the front road of Osan City C to proceed along the three-lanes in the direction of the Southern distance.

Since there is a signal apparatus installed, in this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by reducing the speed and keeping the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving while under the influence of alcohol while normal driving is difficult due to the negligence of the Defendant’s negligence, and received a part of the front part of the passenger vehicle in front of the instant vehicle, following the victim E (Nam, 49 years old), who was under the influence of the signal stop at the bend.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury of the victim E, such as brain-dead sugar, scopic scopium, and scopical salt scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, etc.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven a B-hand car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.208 percent from the public parking lot for the Round located in the 13-6 Round-ro, Olsan-si, Olsan-si, to the roads in front of the same city, from around 4 kilometers of approximately 0.208.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement statement E in the police station.

arrow