logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.08.13 2015나40200
양수금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid next shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap 1, 3, and 4 (including virtual numbers), the defendant entered into a credit card use contract with Samsung Card Co., Ltd. on June 27, 2001, setting the overdue interest rate of 17% per annum; Samsung Card Co., Ltd. transferred the defendant's credit card use-price to Solomon Mutual Savings Bank on December 20, 2005, and notified the defendant of the transfer around that time; on June 11, 2010, Jlomon Mutual Savings Bank transferred the above credit card use-price claim to the defendant on December 3, 2010, and notified the defendant of the transfer thereof on or around December 3, 201, the credit card use-price amount was the cause of the principal of 1,400,000,000 won, overdue interest, 1,011,336.

According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff, a transferee of the above credit card-based credit card-based credit amount of KRW 2,411,36 and the principal amount of KRW 1,400,00 among them, delay interest rate of KRW 17% per annum from July 30, 2014 to the date of full payment.

If so, the plaintiff's above claim against the defendant should be accepted as reasonable.

Inasmuch as the judgment of the first instance court differs from this conclusion, it is unfair to accept the plaintiff's appeal and revoke the part against the plaintiff in the judgment of the first instance and issue an order to pay the above money to the defendant.

arrow