logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.11 2015나30075
소유권이전등기 경정
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons why the member of the party citing the judgment of the court of first instance states concerning the instant case are as follows, or as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the supplementation of the pertinent part, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The supplementary matters to be deleted.

A. From July 26, 2003 to July 26, 2003, the part 3 of the first instance court's decision is deleted from the same page "from July 26, 2003."

B.On the end of the 5th sentence of the first instance trial, “The Defendant claimed that the Deceased was able to express her will on or around July 2012 when the donation contract was concluded. However, according to the evidence Nos. 3 and 12-2 of the evidence Nos. 12, the Deceased’s cerebral disease is limited to the cases where the function of the arms and legs is limited due to brain dystrophism and impine dystrophism, and the functional degradation caused by dementia is not recognized as a brain dystrophism. The records submitted are as follows: (a) the deceased’s ability to express her intention on or around Sep. 20, 2012; (b) the deceased’s 3th sentence and 12-2 of the evidence Nos. 12 of the evidence No. 12; (c) according to the criteria for determining the degree of disability No. 13000, May 23, 2012, it is found that there was no objective her ability to provide me.

arrow