Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, and imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2013 Highest 1499"
1. The Defendants conspired in collusion with Defendant B from July 31, 2012 to run a lending company with the trade name “D” in Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, 406, published an advertisement in the daily information area, and comprehensively manage credit business by providing and paying loan funds. Defendant A decided to take charge of loan consultation, contract, and collection in the above lending company. Defendant A lent KRW 500,000 to the victim F on the front side of the Seoul Gangdong-gu, Seoul, for seven days on September 4, 2012 and paid KRW 300,000 after deducting KRW 20,000 as prior interest, as indicated in the attached crime daily list I, from August 15, 2012 to September 12, 2012, Defendant A violated the legal interest rate of KRW 399% per annum, exceeding 2085% per annum, with the limitation of interest rate of 37 times per annum 25 to the victims.
2. Although Defendant B is prohibited from transferring or taking over the means of access, he/she intends to purchase the passbook, cash card, and password from the contacted G, and he/she allows A to purchase the passbook, cash card, and password from the contacted G. On August 2012, 2012, Defendant B paid KRW 1 million to G in the vicinity of the Gangseo-gu, Gangseo-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seogdong Cldong, by getting G to obtain a new bank passbook (Account Number H), cash card, and password from G. The Defendants conspired with the Defendants of “2013 High-Class 2908,” and any person who intends to engage in credit business shall register with the competent administrative agency, and if the unregistered credit service provider provides loans, the interest rate shall not exceed the interest rate under the Interest Limitation Act without registering the credit business. Defendant B provided first counseling on the loan conditions against the loan applicants, and notified Defendant A of his/her phone number.