1. On October 5, 2018, the Defendant urged the Plaintiff to issue an order for illegal diversion of mountainous district, which was rendered against the Plaintiff, in Cheongju-si. B.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s permission for mountainous district conversion from March 18, 2012 to the same year without obtaining permission from the head of the petition Gun.

4. From the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, B, 300 square meters of forest land and C, and 1,427 square meters of forest land and C (hereinafter referred to as “instant land” by combining the above B and C land, hereinafter) to fill and dispose of earth by using one of the equipment of the blicks, and installing tin and U plium.

B. On May 18, 2012, the Defendant issued an order to recover illegal diversion of mountainous district (hereinafter “previous order”) with the following details, specifying only the instant land as the subject matter of the order to recover. On July 30, 2012, the subject matter of the order to recover the previous order clearly stating the deadline until November 20, 2012.

(a) Removal of illegal facilities (Tyllium and U fluium);

(b) Restoration to a mountainous district, the form and quality of which has been illegally altered, and the restoration to the original state of trees - the recovery to a natural drainage channel as originally planned : the species of fruit trees, such as big-clar trees, and the species of forest trees - the size of a tree: at least 0.7-1.5 meters, and at least 140 copies (the number of seeded trees on both sides of a natural drainage channel): 140 copies;

(c) Henbling (up-up of an area likely to cause soil or sand) in a mountainous district, the illegal form and quality of which has been changed - Henbling seeds for domestic service as soon as possible;

(d) prevention of soil outflow from illegal land - Notice of urging the implementation of measures to prevent damage to soil outflow when concentrated on illegal land (Evidence B No. 16).

C. On May 30, 2012, the Plaintiff was indicted for a violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, and was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million by approximately KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,0000 won. However, on October 9, 2012, the Plaintiff was convicted of a fine of KRW 3 million by this Court Decision 201Da611.

Around November 2012, the Plaintiff submitted an application for extension of the period of restoration to the original state for the previous order of restoration (Evidence No. 1) and sought an extension of the period of restoration.