1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Basic Facts

Plaintiff

B On April 13, 2011, the petitioner-head of the Gun newly constructed a factory on the ground, such as Cheongju-si, P, etc., and obtained approval from the petitioner-head of the Gun for a start-up business plan with the trade name of "D", which carries on the tea processing

Plaintiff

B The Plaintiff, a partner of the Plaintiff, from March 18, 2012 to the same year without obtaining permission for mountainous district conversion from the petitioner Gun.

4. To the Haman, Cheongju-si, U.S. E forest and 300 square meters of forest and F forest and 1,427 square meters of forest land (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land” by combining the above E and F land) installed tinum and U.S. plum (PPPPumme) on the ground of clicker’s excavation and rearrangement work using one refluor.

Matters concerning restoration orders;

(a) Removal of illegal facilities (Tyllium and U fluium);

(b) Restoration to a mountainous district, the form and quality of which has been illegally altered, and the restoration to the original state of trees - the recovery to a natural drainage channel as originally planned : the species of fruit trees, such as big-clar trees, and the species of forest trees - the size of a tree: at least 0.7-1.5 meters, and at least 140 copies (the number of seeded trees on both sides of a natural drainage channel): 140 copies;

(c) Henbling (up-up of an area likely to cause soil or sand) in a mountainous district, the illegal form and quality of which has been changed - Henbling seeds for domestic service as soon as possible;

D. On May 18, 2012, the Defendant took measures to prevent damage from earth and sand outflow when concentrating on illegal land - The Defendant issued an order to recover illegal conversion (hereinafter “instant recovery order”) with respect to the instant land to the Plaintiff, as set forth below, and notified the Plaintiff on July 30, 2012 to urge the implementation of the previous recovery order by specifying the deadline as the period until November 20, 2012.

Plaintiff

A was convicted of a violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, and was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million in the amount of a fine of KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won by this Court on May 30, 2012. However, on October 9, 2012, A was convicted of a fine of KRW 3 million by this Court Decision 201Da611.

Plaintiff

A is above D.

the judgment of conviction under paragraph (1).