logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.03.11 2014고단463
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 29, 2013, at around 02:35, the Defendant: (a) landed from a taxi driven by the victim C (the age of 51) in front of the Gangnam-gu Seoul apartment zone; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to “I will see why I am flick, why I am flick, and why I am flick. I am back; and (c) the police officers dispatched upon receiving the victim’s report confirmed the details of the report against the victim at the time when I am flick, I am the victim’s side flick, thereby leading him to the victim once.

2. The Defendant: (a) attempted to punish the Defendant, as stated in paragraph (1), at the time, place, and paragraph (1) of this Article, and solicited the Defendant to arrest a suspect as a flagrant offender and to board the police officer, and (b) obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by assaulting the Defendant, such as dice d or ebbbing inside the police spons of the spons of the spons of the spons, dyke, and sponsing “nick spons of the spons of the spons; and (c) moving the spons of the spice D into his hand; (d) making the part of the left part of the sponsed D on one occasion by drinking, etc. to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to E, D, and C;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Mutual Crimes of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties on Market);

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment (the fact that the person's error is pened in depth, the fact that there exists no same criminal record except for a fine once a fine prior to ten years and a one-time suspension of indictment, the extent of damage is relatively small, and the fact that it is deemed that any contingent crime has been committed under the influence of alcohol, etc.);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.

arrow