A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 18, 2013, the Defendant driven C rocketing car around 21:38, the Defendant had a duty of care to accurately operate the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim D and the victim F (F, 40 years old) who was on board XG car with the victim D and the victim F (F, a woman, 40 years old) who was on board the victim D with the victim's vehicle by taking part of the victim D (the 43-year-old part of the left back part of the driver's vehicle) which was under a stop for traffic signal in the three-lane due to the negligence of neglecting it, thereby causing an injury to each party for about two weeks medical treatment, and at the same time, 4,908,207 won of the repair cost to damage the back of the XG car and stop immediately, and thereby, escape without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police against D or F;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and written estimate under Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation ( normal consideration, such as the fact that the damage is insignificant, that the vehicle has subscribed to the comprehensive automobile insurance policy, that the defendant has a defect with hearing impairment, and that the defendant has a reflective nature);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) (the repeated consideration in these circumstances) of the Criminal Act or more;