logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.08.12 2014고단887
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) around 23:00 on January 8, 2014, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of ambibured C after drinking alcohol at an irregular area located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul), thereby diving in the atmosphere of the signal, around 04:00 the following day, after driving the motor vehicle of amburged C, at the end of 605 amburged.

Even after a signal has been changed, the Defendant was requested to respond to the measurement of drinking by E and one other, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that he was driving while drunkly under the influence of alcohol, by reporting that he stopped in the first line and was under the influence of alcohol.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 같은 날 04:10경부터 같은 날 04:30경까지 3회에 걸쳐 이를 거부하거나 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 정당한 사유 없이 음주측정을 거부하였다.

2. When the Defendant refused to take a drinking test at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), as stated in paragraph (1), and was arrested from E and one other police officer in flagrantly committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., refusal to take a drinking test), the Defendant took a bath to “scambling police officer” as the Defendant was arrested from E and one other police officer in charge of the violation of the Road Traffic Act (i.e., the police officer’s scam). In his hand, the Defendant scamed off the chest part of the police officer’s chest, scambling the scam, walked the scambing part of the left part of the police officer’s chest, walked the scambling part of the police officer’s scambling, scambling the scambling of the above scambling part of the police officer’s scambling, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate criminal investigation activities, and damaged public goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the third court date);

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Report on the use register of a drinking measuring instrument, report on the results of the drinking driving control, report on the state of the driving, on-site photograph, etc.;

1. Written estimate;

arrow