1. The Defendants’ respective KRW 500,000 per annum from April 23, 2014 to July 11, 2017, respectively, to the Plaintiff and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 18, 2014, the Plaintiff had an interview with G in relation to the structure of the sinking accident of the Sewol ferry, and the Korea Coast Guard did not support the rescue work of the private divings, and the interview was broadcasted on the same day.

The Plaintiff was detained and prosecuted on charges of impairing the honor of the Commissioner General of the Korea Coast Guard by pointing out false facts, and was sentenced to not guilty in the first instance court (Seoul District Court Decision 2014No612, Jan. 9, 2015) and the appellate court (Seoul District Court Decision 2015No200, Sept. 1, 2016).

B. When L’s articles were posted under the title “K” on the bulletin board [J] of H Internet portal site (DAUM), the Defendants prepared and posted comments on the following contents:

- 피고 B : 이 여자 뭐야 진짜 정체가 뭐야 세상에 서프라이즈에서나 나올법한 스토리를 가진미친년이네 - C : 아미친년 얘만보면 한 대까고싶게생겼어 ㅠ - D : 저미친년이 !! 떨어져!!!!!! 도망가얘드라!!!!!!

- E: In the past of this year, and in the past of this year,

This year - F: The fact that as shown in the year which was the year which was the year which was the year which was the year which was the low-level foot, the fact that there is no dispute about the past, the entries in Gap evidence 1 through 6, 15, and 16, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The Defendants, inasmuch as they posted an article that could undermine the Plaintiff’s social reputation on the bulletin board of the website where multiple and unspecified persons can confirm the contents of the article, and committed a tort that insults the Plaintiff, the Defendants are obligated to compensate for mental suffering suffered by the Plaintiff.

The amount of consolation money shall be KRW 500,000, respectively, in full view of the contents of and number of inquiries into the comments prepared and posted by the Defendants, the age of the Defendants, the background leading up to the preparation of comments on comments, and the circumstances thereafter.

Therefore, the defendants are liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages of KRW 500,000 each, and they are liable to compensate for the damages from April 23, 2014.