Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2015, from around 06:0 to 10:00, the Defendant got the Defendant to board a dry field located in Chungcheongnam-dong C, Chungcheongnam-do.

For this reason, the victims' dry field can be transferred to the next side of the dry field, so there was a duty of care to confirm whether the dry field was completely cut out before leaving the dry field.

Despite such fact, the defendant neglected to do so and moved from the above dry field to the dry field of the victim in the above dry field, and the reference to "goods mentioned in Article 166 or 167, which belong to his own property" should be interpreted to mean "goods mentioned in Article 166, which belong to his own property, or things mentioned in Article 167, regardless of whether they belong to another person's own property," as "goods mentioned in Article 167, which belong to his own property" (see Supreme Court Decision 2002Do1899, Jun. 14, 2002, etc.). The defendant destroyed nick tree nick tree 242, walkb trees 5, etc. under the market price, thereby causing public danger.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of D and E;

1. Results of on-site inspections by this court;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 170(2) and (1), and Article 167(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense indicated as “Article 170(1) of the Criminal Act,” but the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court reveals that the above applicable law and the facts constituting an offense are correct.

As such, recognition does not materially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his right to defend.

Since it is determined, it is recognized ex officio without being changed in the indictment.

2. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

3. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the assertion is the instant fire.