Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 8, 2017, the injured Defendant: (a) was driving on the road in front of the C convenience store located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) on October 22:17, 2017; and (c) was inflicted on the injured Defendant, by hearing the horses from the victim D(49 tax) that “I am unable to pass by the vehicle because I am driving on the road,” thereby causing injury to the victim, such as a sugar, in which there is no one open for two weeks of treatment.”

2. On October 8, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) was placed in front of the F convenience store located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) on the front day of the F convenience store in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (c) on the front day of the F convenience store, Seocheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; and (d) on the 112th day of the dispatch, the police officer, who belongs to the G police unit in the Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, the police officer of the G police unit in the G police station

A bitch fluor, fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor

Before doing so, “The above H and I are fluent,” and the above H expressed the desire to “I, fluent fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, at the right face of H at one time.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Each statement of D, J and K;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of a motor vehicle boom image statute in the instant field;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of injury) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the facts leading up to each of the crimes in this case and the attitude of the act; and (b) the Defendant is not less complicated.