beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months and fine of 3,00,000 won, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months and Defendant C.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A performed the duty of tax investigation from January 2007 to February 2, 2009 by H National Tax Service’s investigation 1 and 6 lines, and performed the duty of tax investigation on the corporation. From September 2008 to February 201, 201, Defendant B belonged to the said six lines from January 2007 to January 201, 207, and Defendant C belonged to the said six lines.
H National Tax Service conducted a non-regular tax investigation with respect to L/C to November 17, 2008 in accordance with the “Plan for Investigation of A/L recipient”. At the time, Defendant A conducted a tax investigation as the team leader, Defendant B, and Defendant C conducted a tax investigation as the team leader.
1. From the end of November 208 to December 2008, Defendants B and C acquired KRW 50 million in cash as a reward for the payment of the amount of the additional tax from the tax investigation conducted by the former department of the KYI in the territory of the military cargo terminal near the Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si. Defendant B received KRW 16 million in cash, and Defendant C received KRW 14 million in each of them. Defendant A received KRW 20 million in the office of Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si.
Accordingly, the Defendants accepted a bribe in relation to the duties of public officials.
2. Defendant A’s acceptance of bribe from March 2009 to April 2009, with the representative director, N, etc. of the KM A in Gangnam-gu Seoul at the “MM A restaurant” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and received KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.
Accordingly, the defendant accepted a bribe in relation to the public official's duties.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant A's partial statement
1. Each legal statement of the defendant B and C
1. Each suspect examination protocol of the prosecution (including each statement written by N, J and C) against Defendant A, 2, 3 and 4 times;
1. Defendants B 2, 3, 5, and 7 each prosecutor’s interrogation protocol N and J.