A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the representative of the “C” in Sejong-si B, who operates the business of manufacturing electronic components assembly.

On September 3, 1992, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Bank of Korea branch and the Bank of Korea branch and issued a provisional coefficient mark in the name of the Defendant, which was 340, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 1992.

On March 30, 2018, the Defendant issued one check number “D”, “amount of 5,00,000 won”, and “the issuance date on June 27, 2018” at the above C office, and issued one check number on June 27, 2018, which is the check number of the said bank transaction check. The Defendant presented the check payment proposal on June 27, 2018.

However, from March 26, 2018 to May 30, 2018, the Defendant issued a total of KRW 40,000,000 per unit for eight occasions, as shown in the attached crime list, and failed to pay for the shortage of deposits, respectively, as well as for the Defendant’s shortage of deposits.

The Defendant is the representative of the “C” in Sejong-si B, who operates the business of assembling electronic parts.

On September 3, 1992, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the Bank of Korea small-type 340 (Small-type dong) in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and issued a provisional coefficient mark in the name of the Defendant.

On May 29, 2018, the Defendant issued one check number “E”, par value “5,00,000,” and issuance date “ August 26, 2018” at the above C office, which is the check number “E”, “E”, “5,00,000,” and issued one check number on August 27, 2018.

However, the Defendant issued a total of KRW 45,00,000 per unit on nine occasions from that time to June 25, 2018, as shown in the list of offenses, and failed to pay on the date of presentation for each reason of the disposition of suspension of transaction, as well as on which the Defendant did not pay on the date of presentation.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 4618"

1. The court of the defendant;