beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. The judgment of the court of first instance is subject to Paragraph (1).
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part written by the court as described in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure
2. Parts to be dried;
A. Each “$ 215,144” of the first instance judgment Nos. 9, 9, and 11, respectively, shall be “$ 215,114”, and each “this case” of the first instance judgment Nos. 9, 17, and 10 shall be each “the first instance trial.”
B. On the 9th instance judgment, Article 20 and 21 of the text of the first instance judgment "291,794,40 won [270,180 U.S. dollars + 55,036 US$215,144] x 1,000 [291,762,000 in total + 270,150 US$270,036 US$ 55,036 US$215,114) x 1,00] are written."
C. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 10, 15, 11, 7, 11, 11, 11, 10, 200, 200, 30
A person shall be appointed.
B. First of all, determination 1 ought to be postponed when the Defendant repaid the consolidated public charges, additional charges, or the obligation to pay the subrogated amount, and accordingly, whether the Defendant is not liable for delay for the said obligation is examined.
According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, Article 24 (1) 1 of the Rules of this case provides that "a management agency may postpone a notice of a public charge or make a decision in installments when it deems that an employer is unable to pay a public charge because of a serious loss of property caused by a disaster," and Article 24 (2) and (3) of the Rules of this case provides that "a user is subject to a postponement of a notice under paragraph (1) or a partial notice of a public charge, he/she shall file an application with the management agency in writing, and the management agency may dismiss the employer's application when it considers that the application for a deferment of notice or a written notice of division is unreasonable."