Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. On June 24, 2014, the Plaintiff received from the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation (hereinafter referred to as the “Agricultural Cooperative Federation”) (hereinafter referred to as the “CF”) that is a creditor of the credit card use case No. 2011Gada153094 from the foregoing judgment claim (as to KRW 9,219,50 and KRW 6,97,316 among them, an amount equivalent to 25% per annum from August 3, 2011 to the date of full payment) from the National Agricultural Cooperative. On July 2, 2015, the Plaintiff notified the NAF to B of the above transfer. The Plaintiff concluded an inherited property division agreement with the Defendant, one-six square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant real property”) in excess of the debt amount and transferred the above shares to the Defendant as a fraudulent act, and thus, cancelled and transferred the registration of the instant case as the purport of the claim for restitution.
In regard to this, the defendant's defense that the lawsuit of revocation of the fraudulent act of this case should be dismissed because the period of exclusion should be exceeded and that the lawsuit of revocation of the fraudulent act of this case should be filed within one year from the date the creditor becomes aware of the cause of revocation. In full view of the entries in the evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 11 and the purport of the whole pleadings, as the defendant and Eul's mother of the defendant and Eul died on July 28, 2010 (E, the husband of D, died on September 20, 205), the defendant, G, H, and I inherited the property of this case for each of 1/6 shares, on the other hand, the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, which completed the registration of provisional seizure of this case's real estate of this case as of July 29, 2010 (hereinafter "the building of this case"), and on the provisional seizure of this case's real estate of this case as of July 29, 2010 by the defendant's heir 201.