Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 11, 2015, the Defendant driven B MT car with alcohol content of 0.163% in blood around 19:09, while under the influence of alcohol, and led to the flow of tin-distance from the middle east of the middle east of the 2nd apartment zone in the West-si, Seopopo-si.

In this case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by driving the front side and accurately operating the steering and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform the above duty of care in a state where it is difficult to drive the vehicle normally due to influence of drinking and failed to turn to the left at the left, and was in the front part of the victim C(30) driving, which was operated directly from the north Eastern Zone to the middle East Zone, and was in the right side of the said math car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as finite finites, which require approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A written statement prepared by C related to a traffic accident;

1. Report on the circumstances of a driver who is placed in driving and notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. On-site and photographs of accident vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes concerning the crime, Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order shall be determined as follows:

A favorable condition: The injury suffered by the victim is not relatively serious, and the driving vehicle of the defendant is the vehicle.