The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not shock the e-mail vehicle that was driven on the opposite side while driving the e-mail vehicle at the time and place indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, but did not match the e-mail vehicle that was driven on the right side after the Defendant carried out a U-turn. Thus, the Defendant did not violate the duty of safety driving.

2. According to each evidence duly adopted and examined in the judgment of the court below and the court below, ① the date and time stated in the facts charged in this case; ② the defendant her driving of the Poter freight in the direction of approximately one hour in the direction of the road; ② the defendant her driving of the Poter in the direction of the road; ③ the Pool in the direction of the vehicle at the right side of the road at the direction of the road; ③ the vehicle at the direction of the front and rear side of the vehicle at the right side of the road; ② the vehicle at the direction of the vehicle at the direction of the front and rear side of the vehicle at the direction of the road; ② the vehicle at the direction of the front and rear side of the vehicle at the direction of the road; ③ the vehicle at the direction of the front and rear side of the vehicle at the right side of the vehicle at the direction of approximately one hour; ③ the vehicle at the right side of the vehicle at the direction of the front and rear side of the vehicle at the direction of the vehicle at the front and rear side of the vehicle.