The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not assault the victim, and the victim only pushed the victim out of the convenience store by avoiding the disturbance within the convenience store, and the lower court erred in misunderstanding of facts that found the Defendant guilty of the crime of assault.

B. The court below's sentence of unfair sentencing (the fine of 500,000 won) imposed on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the defendant and the victim did a dispute as a matter of settlement of the price of a horse away from the convenience store display stand, and the defendant got a drink once, and confirmed the fact that the victim gets a part of the victim's neck to the convenience store. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

B. As to the assertion on unfair sentencing, the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant was punished twice as a fine and has no record of criminal punishment more than a suspended sentence, that the defendant is old, and that the defendant's economic situation is not sufficient (the defendant asserts that he suffered damage due to the victim's knee-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-g-fe-fe-fe-fe-