logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.12.11 2014고단118
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant

A A The fines of KRW 5,00,000, KRW 1,500,000, KRW 1,500,000, and KRW 2,00,00, each of the defendants C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] Defendant A served as the representative of E farming association from September 4, 2007 to January 26, 2010. Defendant A was a person who was supported by the Korea Rural Community Corporation in the name of “Yyang-gu E Rural Community Comprehensive Development Project,” and was in charge of the above business. Defendant B was a person who was in charge of the above business of the said farming association while working as the representative of the said farming association from January 26, 201 to October 7, 2013. Defendant C was a person who was working as the secretary of the said farming association from March 2009 to March 31, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 201, Defendant B and Defendant C’s co-principaled Defendants were in the above farming association office located in Kangwon-gu, Yangwon-gun, Gangwon-gu, Suwon-gun, and the head of the victim G company G with the death of the landscaped trees: “(a)G was dead.” Defendant B and Defendant C conducted the construction of the defect repair of the dead trees by checking the cost of 3,000,000 won for the defect repair of the dead trees on the face of the State and subsequently, Defendant C would no longer request the repair of the defect to the State (a)G.”

However, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to repair dead landscape trees even if they received the cost of repairing sewage from the G, and attempted to pay the electricity fee of the said farming association.

As above, the Defendants deceiving the above H and transferred KRW 3,00,000 to the Nong Bank account in the name of Defendant A as the defect repair cost around December 15, 201, around December 15, 2011.

2. Defendant A

A. On May 15, 2008, the Defendant: (a) was in general in charge of a project for the comprehensive development of rural villages; (b) was able to use part of the purchase cost of the victim E farming association for personal purposes as part of the project.

Accordingly, the defendant was on May 2008 at the office of the above farming association corporation, and from B.

arrow