beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five years.
The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around December 2017, the Defendant, “2018 Gohap54,” had the victim C (the child and juvenile at the time, 17 years of age) and D, a mobile Mebry, and the victim, who had conversationsd by telephone, had not established sexual values, had the victim take pictures of a specific body part, and video Mebry, and had the victim take pictures of his/her act of self-defense, and had the victim take pictures of his/her act of self-defense, and had him/her receive such video.
1. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (production, distribution, etc. of obscene materials);
A. The Defendant: 2018
1. At around 14:40, at the defendant's office located in the area of the Jeonbuk-gun E, the victim sent a letter to the effect that the victim would know about his act of self-defense by communicating with the victim, and if he does not transmit the image of his act of self-defense, the victim’s act of self-defense by sending it to the effect that he would make the victim know about the act of self-defense by sending it to the existing body, and inducing the victim to fright his resistance, and let the victim get the victim off the clothes, put the knick, put the knick, put the knick in the knive part, and then produced the video file with the victim’s cell phone and then produced the child or juvenile pornography using the victim’s cell phone by taking the knick
As a result, the defendant forcedly committed indecent acts by threatening the victim who is a child or juvenile, and simultaneously produced child or juvenile pornography.
B. At around 15:00 on January 19, 2018, the Defendant demanded the victim to send a video image of his act of self-defense to the victim at the above Defendant’s home, but the victim refused to do so, the Defendant did not have a duty to comply with the agreement to the effect that he would know the video of his act of self-defense that the victim was sent to the previous one.