Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for one year.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:50 on May 19, 2013, the Defendants, while drinking alcohol together at “Gjun-si E” operated by the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Defendant B went to the toilets outside of the main place, and the toilets were confined in the toilets because the toilets were not opened, the Defendants, and the Defendants, upon receiving a report of 112, sent to the scene.

Defendant

B The above I and J expressed their desire to the J on the ground that the position is not understood by them, “A civilian cane fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor.”

Accordingly, I and J attempted to arrest Defendant B as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult, Defendant B was assaulted by Justice J, I’s body by hand, Defendant A and Defendant C by knife, Defendant J, I’s hand, and knife, Defendant C’s body.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation of police officers' crimes and the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements (the second court date)

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to F, J, and I;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. The Defendants subject to suspended execution: (a) the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter, taking into account the factors favorable to the Defendants among the reasons for sentencing) are first offenders; (b) the circumstances leading to the instant crime; (c) the circumstances leading to the Defendants; (d) the mode of obstruction of performance of official duties; and (e) the Defendants against the mistake, shall be determined by taking into account

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.