logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.10 2014가단5106291
매매대금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 27, 2009, the Plaintiff, a elementary school student, obtained a loan of 1.5 million won with a label attached to the producer F, production year, 1915, and production area Italy (hereinafter “the instant loan”). On October 26, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendants for the lending of 1.5 million won with the rental fee at the store of YE’s sales.

B. At the time of the above malicious loan agreement, H, who was working as the 1st century as the incidental owner in G, had D attend and had D take the total of 3-5 times including the instant Bain for about one hour, and the Plaintiff decided to obtain a loan of the instant Bain, which was recommended by H, with the highest sound of H, and with its land category being well-grounded with D’s hand.

C. The above malicious loan contract (Evidence A 1) states that "product name: F 1915", "amount: 120 million won: KRW 1500,000,000 won "," and the phrase "I would like to state that "I would like to state that I would like to state that I will purchase the musical instrument, i.e., purchase the musical instrument, if I would like to impair the value of the musical instrument during the lending period, i.e., damage that would hinder the life of the musical instrument, and that I would like to state that I would pay the musical instrument."

After 3 days from the date of the above malicious loan contract, D damaged the front front lighting part of the loan of this case.

The Defendants repaired the instant sludge and had an obvious scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, but around that time, delivered D

D has been using the instant rocks until the date of the closing of argument and is receiving Leson from H.

E. The plaintiff and the defendants on October 3, 2009 are the plaintiff of this case.

arrow