1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 18,062,50 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from November 4, 2016 to November 14, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties and the Plaintiff of the instant musical instruments, who majored in the art high school and music colleges from the time of middle school attendance, graduated from the arts high school and the music colleges, and are members of the present musical organizations, while engaging in regular activities. On the other hand, the Plaintiff is a professional who participated in the operation of the individual number of documents and sound records recording.

The plaintiff from around 2010

W. He. H. H. Ammmmg. Leipz no 1885, Linzgin (hereinafter “the instant musical instrument”) have been owned, and has been used in the musical instruments and Lindin.

2) Defendant C Co., Ltd. is a corporation that is established and operated with its business purposes such as container performance planning services, sound apparatus lending, musical instruments retail business, etc., and Defendant B is an employee who mainly takes charge of sound management affairs under the employment of Defendant C. (b) On November 3 and 4, 2016, FG “G” joint performance (hereinafter “instant performance”) was held in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, for both both days and four days.

In the performance of this case, nine performers participated in the performance of this case, and the plaintiff took charge of the second part among them, and the defendant C was a company in charge of sound, and the defendant B participated in the performance of this case as the person in charge of sound management at the site of the defendant C.

2) On November 4, 2016, for the preparation and final inspection of the instant performance in P.I.D., the instant performance site was conducted. Most musical musical instruments, including the instant Bain, were attached to small microphones for the purpose of expanding the sound and appropriately transmitting it to the audience, and this microphone was connected to the audience, and this connection was realized in the actual performance and inspection. 3) At around 17:00 on the same day, the Plaintiff was attached to the later part of the given break time at approximately 20 minutes in the middle of the instant performance.