The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal (fact-finding) did not have any evidence to acknowledge that there was no evidence to acknowledge that there was no such circumstance as above, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case on the ground that there was no evidence to acknowledge that there was no evidence to acknowledge that there was no circumstance as above, even if the transaction was made with C, the amount of the claim arising from the transaction reaches 50 million won, and further, whether C requested a subrogation against the Defendant.

2. Determination

A. On October 10, 2013, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case, at the Daejeon District Court 313 Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, Daejeon District Court 313, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the said court 2013Gahap255 lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff C against Defendant D and E., and then traded to C with the FF around 2004, and supplied it to C. (Defendant) and C were sold to low-income from G fishing village fraternities, and then transferred the amount calculated at KRW 100,000,000,000 to the low-income amount of KRW 50,000,000,000,0000,000,000 won, which was not received from the last transaction with C, to receive KRW 40,501,501,005,000,000,000,000 from E.14.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not enter into an agreement with C or engage in any other transaction with C in 2004, but did not receive 500,000 km (50,000 x 100 won =50,000,000) from G fishing village fraternity in 2004, and did not transfer to C, so there was no fact that the Defendant received 500,000 km (50,000 x 50,000) from C, and there was no claim for 50,000,000 won in the name of the intermediate profit accrued from sales with P., and it was substituted by E.