A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) lent KRW 50 million to the victim’s residence in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, to the effect that “the Defendant would not arbitrarily release the salted salt until full repayment of the loan amount,” the Defendant borrowed KRW 50 million from the person who consented to the purchase of the salted salt in the warehouse attached to the victim’s residence, to the effect that “the Defendant would lend the salted salting amount of KRW 50 million to the victim to purchase the salted salting; and (b) manufactured the salted salting by hiring the staff at the warehouse attached to the victim’s residence.”

On September 30, 2014, at the warehouse owned by the victim in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon on September 15:0, 2014, the Defendant taken up 101 sporesporessing in the market value of KRW 10.1 million at the market value in custody of the victim.

In addition, Done Starsch Rexroth has been loaded on his/her operating vehicle without the consent of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the goods of the defendant, which is the object of the victim's right, and obstructed the victim's exercise of right.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 323 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The fact that the suspended sentence reflects the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, and the reason why the crime was committed; and